Determining user interactions with natural language processor (NPL) items in documents to determine priorities to present NPL items in documents to review

ABSTRACT

Provided are a computer program product, system, and method for determining user interactions with natural language processor (NLP) items in documents to determine priorities to present NLP items in documents to review. Information is received on user interactions with natural language processing (NLP) items in documents presented at least one computing device. Indication is made in a database of user interaction information on the user interactions with the NLP items indicated in the received transmitted information. The user interaction information in the database providing interaction information for NLP items in the selected document is used to determine an order of the NLP items in the selected document. Content of the NLP items in the selected document is transmitted to present to a reviewing user at a reviewing computing device in the determined order.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention

The present invention relates to a computer program product, system, andmethod to determine priorities to present natural language processor(NLP) items items in documents to review.

2. Description of the Related Art

Natural language processing (NLP) of unstructured text documents allowsa software system to extract concepts from the documents that can thenbe analyzed in order to present meaningful information to a user. Forinstance, medical documents (physician clinic notes, pathology reports,etc.) may be processed by the NLP system in order to extract a patient'sdiagnosis, past medical history, therapy history, and other data neededto evaluate a patient for the next steps in their treatment. With NLPprocessing, there may be errors in the processed data that may need tobe corrected. Mistakes may be especially problematic if the errors arefor mission critical information, like errors in medical information,such as patient medical conditions, diagnosis, current medicationregimens, etc.

There is a need in the art to provide improved techniques for presentingusers with NLP extracted information to review to optimize userinteraction to review and correct errors in the NLP content.

SUMMARY

Provided are a computer program product, system, and method fordetermining user interactions with natural language processor (NLP)items in documents to determine priorities to present NLP items indocuments to review. Information is received on user interactions withnatural language processing (NLP) items in documents presented at leastone computing device. Indication is made in a database of userinteraction information on the user interactions with the NLP itemsindicated in the received transmitted information. The user interactioninformation in the database providing interaction information for NLPitems in the selected document is used to determine an order of the NLPitems in the selected document. Content of the NLP items in the selecteddocument is transmitted to present to a reviewing user at a reviewingcomputing device in the determined order.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 illustrates an embodiment of a network information managementenvironment.

FIG. 2 illustrates an embodiment of an interaction information packagesent form a user computing device on interactions with Natural LanguageProcessor (NLP) items.

FIG. 3 illustrates an embodiment of user interaction information oninteraction with NLP items.

FIG. 4 illustrates an embodiment of NLP item priority information.

FIG. 5 illustrates an embodiment of an NLP item transmission.

FIG. 6 illustrates an embodiment of operations at an interacting usercomputing device to detect interactions with NLP items and generate theinteraction information package.

FIG. 7 illustrates an embodiment of operations to process an interactioninformation package to generate user interaction information.

FIG. 8 illustrates an embodiment of operations to process userinteraction information in a user interaction database to generatepriorities for NLP items used to determine an order for presenting NLPitems to a reviewing user.

FIG. 9 illustrates an embodiment of operations to detect and sendinformation on user interaction with NLP items and to render NLP itemsin a document in a user interface according to an ordering based on theuser interactions.

FIG. 10 illustrates an embodiment of operations to process modificationsto NLP items from the reviewing user.

FIG. 11 illustrates a computing environment in which the components ofFIG. 1 may be implemented.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

NLP systems may need to present to user NLP items and content in adocument to review or correct. However, users in a system may havelimited time to review NLP items in a document to correct. In a medicalrecord system, a doctor may be presented with a vast array of importantNLP items in medical records to correct. This can consist of manyscreens of information, and it is often overwhelming to a user. In fact,a user may become so frustrated with having to correct so many NLPitems, they may decide to avoid using the NLP correction and reviewsystem due to the time commitment.

Described embodiments provide techniques to observe user interactionwith NLP items in a document to determine the interaction frequency withthe NLP items and context attribute values related to interaction withthe document. The gathered NLP item interaction information, along withcontext attribute values related to the context of the interaction, maybe saved as user interaction in a computer database. When the NLP systemis generating a document to present to a user, the NLP system may thenconsider interaction frequencies of NLP items in specific contexts,similar to the context with which the document will be reviewed, todetermine a priority of NLP items based on their interaction frequency.This priority information may be used to determine an order in which theNLP items are presented to a user to review and correct, so that theuser will focus on those NLP items collectively deemed by similar usersin similar contexts in the system to be of high importance, as evidencedby their interaction frequency with the NLP items. The user may thenfocus on those NLP items they recognize as important and ignore ordisregard the later presented NLP items having lower priority, asevidenced by a lower interaction frequency.

Described embodiments also provide improved techniques and datastructures for gathering NLP item interaction information at the usercomputing devices to record the relevant information concerning the userinteraction with the NLP items rendered in a computer user interface,including context attribute values related to the context of theinteraction and the interaction frequency with the NLP items.

Described embodiments also provide improved computer database structuresto improve the management of information on user interactions with NLPitems and the context of that information to allow later databasesearching of the interaction information to generate priority values forthe NLP items that are specific to the context attributes in which theinteractions occurred. Examples of context attributes include userspecific context, subject matter specific context of the NLP items, andNLP item specific attributes, such as interrogative sentences in whichthe NLP items were included. These improved database structures allowfor focus on accessing NLP item information for specified contextattribute values to use to determine a priority based on the interactionby users across documents in the network in similar context. Thecumulative priority may then be used to determine an order in which NLPitems should be presented to the user to review that reflects prioritybased on actual interaction by similarly situated users with the NLPitems.

Described embodiments provide further improved computer technology toimprove the way the user interface program of the user computer gathersuser interactions with NLP items to provide to the server and to presentNLP items to the user so as to optimize the user responses andcorrections to NLP items in a document. With described embodiments, usercomputers detect interactions with natural language processing (NLP)items in documents and, for each interaction with an NLP item, each usercomputer sends interaction information to the server on the interactionincluding information on a context attribute value for a contextattribute related to the interaction with the NLP item.

With described embodiments, multiple of the user computers gather theirinformation on interactions with NLP items to send to the server to useto determine a priority value for the NLP items. When a user requests adocument from the server, the server will provide an order for the NLPitems in the requested document based on the NLP item interactioninformation from the plurality of computers. The user interface at theuser computers then presents the NLP items in a requested document tothe user in the order, determined according to the collectiveinformation on user interactions with the NLP items gathered by the usercomputers.

By presenting NLP items having errors to correct to a user in the userinterface according to an order based on a priority determined by afrequency of access by similarly situated users to the NLP itemspriority of the NLP items, the system increases the likelihood the userresponds to the highest priority NLP items to correct by firstpresenting those higher priority NLP items early in the ordering. Inthis way, the user is not overwhelmed by being presented with all theNLP items to correct, but is provided NLP items in an order determinedby a frequency of access by similarly situated users to the NLP items.This presentation assists the user in focusing on first correcting thoseNLP items in the document having a highest priority, and when the userno longer has time or interest in correcting NLP items, those lowerpriority NLP items will be ignored, while the highest priority NLP itemspresented first for consideration to the user will likely have beencorrected.

FIG. 1 illustrates an embodiment of an information retrieval environmenthaving an information manager server 100 maintaining a user interactiondatabase 102 having information on user interaction with documents 104in the database 102. The information manager server 100 may communicatewith a plurality of user computing devices 106 ₁, 106 _(i) . . . 106_(n) over a network 108, where the users are recognized by theinformation manager server 100 to interact with the documents 104. Theinformation manager server 100 includes a memory 110 including anoperating system 112 to manage server 100 operations and interact withconnected devices; a natural language processor 114, such as by way ofexample, the Watson™ Natural Language, to process the documents 104 todetermine Natural Language Processor (NLP) items in the documents 104,which may comprise entities identified in the documents 104, such asclassified named entities in the text classified into categories, suchas names of persons, organizations, locations, expressions of times,terms and entities related to the subject matter of the documents 104,etc.; a document manager 116 to manage access to documents 104 in theuser interaction database 102; and an interaction analyzer 118 toanalyze and process user interaction information included in aninteraction information package 200 transmitted from the user computingdevices 106 ₁, 106 _(i) . . . 106 _(n).

The user interaction database 102 may include records and datastructures, shown as maintained in the memory 110, including userprofile information 120 having information on the users of the usercomputing devices 106 ₁, 106 _(i) . . . 106 _(n), including profilesrelated to positions or roles of the users in the environment in whichthe information manager server 100 is deployed; subject information 122having information on subjects of the documents 104, i.e., to which thedocuments pertain 104, e.g., the subjects may comprise patients and thedocuments 104 may comprise patient medical records; user interactioninformation 300 generated by the interaction analyzer 118 to maintaininformation on user interaction with NLP items in documents 104; and NLPitem priority information 400 having priority values for the NLP itemscalculated by the interaction analyzer 118 and used to determine anorder in which the NLP items are presented to the users at the usercomputing devices 106 ₁, 106 _(i) . . . 106 _(n) to consider. Theinteraction analyzer 118 may generate an NLP item transmission 500 for adocument providing an order with which to present the NLP items in thedocument for the user to review.

The user interaction database 102 may comprise a relational or objectoriented database, or other suitable database types.

In one embodiment, the documents 104 may comprise medical records andthe subjects may comprise patients for which the medical records 106 aremaintained. A medical record 106 may include numerous interrogatorysentences asking questions about the subject/patient's medical history,personal history, current diagnosis, current medication, etc.,comprising the NLP items. Thus the NLP items may comprise objects of theinterrogatory sentences or other patient and medical information theusers enter into the medical records. The users may comprise doctors,nurses, and other medical professionals that may add information to themedical records. The documents 104 may comprise a structured orunstructured document, and be in a format such as Extended MarkupLanguage (XML), Hypertext Markup Language (HTML), a text format, wordprocessor format, etc.

The user computing devices 106 ₁, 106 _(i) . . . 106 _(n), may include,as shown with user computing device 106 _(i), an operating system 124 tomanage and interact with (Input/Output I/O) devices 126, a userinterface 128 in which to render documents 104 from the informationmanager server 100 and allow the user to interact with the documents 104with the I/O devices 126; and interaction detection unit 130 to detectuser interactions with the NLP items in the document 104 rendered in theuser interface 128 with the I/O devices 132; and interaction informationpackage 200 generated by the interaction detection unit 130, includinginformation on user interaction with NLP items in a document 104rendered in the user interface 128.

In one embodiment the I/O devices 126 may comprise a mouse, keyboard,etc., and the interactions may comprise the user selecting or enteringcontent for the NLP items in the document 104 rendered in the userinterface 128. The I/O device 126 may further comprise a gaze trackingdevice to determine an NLP item in the document or interrogativesentence including the NLP item at which the user is gazing. A gazetracking device is typically worn as glasses and includes cameras on theglasses to acquire gazed text or images being gazed by the eyes of theuser. The gaze tracking device includes a camera to capture and analyzean eye image to determine the pupil location to acquire the gazed imageor text the user eyes are staring at or tracking, i.e., gazing atdirectly. The interaction detecting unit 130 may determine the NLP itemor interrogative sentence including the NLP item with which the user isinteracting, such as selecting with a mouse pointer, entering text forwith a keyboard, or gazing at with a gaze tracking glasses.

The user computing devices 106 ₁, 106 _(i) . . . 106 _(n), may comprisea smart phone, tablet, personal digital assistance (PDA), laptop, orstationary computing device, e.g., desktop computer, server. The memory110 may comprise non-volatile and/or volatile memory types, such as aFlash Memory (NAND dies of flash memory cells), a non-volatile dualin-line memory module (NVDIMM), DIMM, Static Random Access Memory(SRAM), ferroelectric random-access memory (FeTRAM), Random AccessMemory (RAM) drive, Dynamic RAM (DRAM), storage-class memory (SCM),Phase Change Memory (PCM), resistive random access memory (RRAM), spintransfer torque memory (STM-RAM), conductive bridging RAM (CBRAM),nanowire-based non-volatile memory, magnetoresistive random-accessmemory (MRAM), and other electrically erasable programmable read onlymemory (EEPROM) type devices, hard disk drives, removable memory/storagedevices, etc.

The user interactive database 102 may be implemented in one or morestorage devices, such as magnetic hard disk drives, solid state storagedevice (SSD) comprised of solid state electronics, EEPROM (ElectricallyErasable Programmable Read-Only Memory), flash memory, flash disk,Random Access Memory (RAM) drive, storage-class memory (SCM), etc.,Phase Change Memory (PCM), resistive random access memory (RRAM), spintransfer torque memory (STT-RAM), conductive bridging RAM (CBRAM),magnetic hard disk drive, optical disk, tape, etc. Data in the storages102 ₁, 102 ₂ . . . 102 _(n) 4 may further be configured from an array ofdevices, such as Just a Bunch of Disks (JBOD), Direct Access StorageDevice (DASD), Redundant Array of Independent Disks (RAID) array,virtualization device, etc.

The network 108 may comprise one or more networks including Local AreaNetworks (LAN), Storage Area Networks (SAN), Wide Area Network (WAN),peer-to-peer network, wireless network, the Internet, etc.

Generally, program modules, such as the program components 112, 114,116, 118, 124, 128, 130, and any others described herein, may compriseroutines, programs, objects, components, logic, data structures, and soon that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract datatypes. The program modules may be practiced in distributed cloudcomputing environments where tasks are performed by remote processingdevices that are linked through a communications network. In adistributed cloud computing environment, program modules may be locatedin both local and remote computer system storage media including memorystorage devices.

The program components and hardware devices of the user computingdevices 106 ₁, 106 _(i) . . . 106 _(n) and information management server100 of FIG. 1 may be implemented in one or more computer systems, whereif they are implemented in multiple computer systems, then the computersystems may communicate over a network.

The program components 112, 114, 116, 118, 124, 128, 130, and any othersdescribed herein, may be accessed by a processor from memory to execute.Alternatively, some or all of the program components 112, 114, 116, 118,124, 128, 130, and any others described herein, may be implemented inseparate hardware devices, such as Application Specific IntegratedCircuit (ASIC) hardware devices.

The functions described as performed by the program components 112, 114,116, 118, 124, 128, 130, and any others described herein, may beimplemented as program code in fewer program modules than shown orimplemented as program code throughout a greater number of programmodules than shown.

FIG. 2 illustrates an embodiment of an interaction information package2001 generated by the interaction detection unit 130 in a user computingdevice 106 _(i) and includes a user identifier 202 of the userinteracting with the user interface 128 when the interaction informationpackage 200 _(i) was generated; an NLP item 204 for which theinteraction was detected; one or more context attribute values 206 forcontext attributes related to the user interaction with the NLP item 204and an interaction frequency 208 indicating one or more distinctinteractions with the NLP item 204.

FIG. 3 illustrates an embodiment of user interaction information 3001generated by the interaction analyzer 118 from a received interactioninformation package 200 _(i), and includes a user identifier 302 of theuser interacting with the NLP item 306, which may be optional; andinteraction ID 304 uniquely identifying the user interaction information300 _(i); the NLP item 306 subject to the interaction; one or moreprofile attribute values 308 of profiles of the user 302, such as rolein an organization, position, personal identification information, etc.;one or more context attribute values 310 from those 206 included in theinteraction information package 200; and an interaction frequency 312also from the corresponding field 208 in the interaction informationpackage 200 _(i).

FIG. 4 illustrates an embodiment of an instance of NLP item priorityinformation 400 _(i), which may be generated at the time a document 104is selected to provide to a user to review or may be generated inadvance to be available when a document is selected, and periodicallyupdated. The NLP item priority information 400 _(i) includes the NLPitem 402 for which the value is generated; a profile attribute value 404of the users whose interactions were considered to calculate thepriority value; one or more context attribute values 406 related to thecontext in which users whose interactions were considered to calculatethe priority value interacted with the NLP item 402; a cumulativeinteraction frequency 408 comprising the total or combination of theinteraction frequencies 312 from all interaction information instances300 _(i) having NLP item 306, profile attribute value 308, and contextattribute values 310 matching those 402, 404, and 406 of the priorityvalue 410 being calculated; and a priority value 410 derived from thecumulative interaction frequency 408. The priority value 410 may bedetermined based on a priority range the number of interactions 408falls within, high, medium, low, etc., or may be calculated as apercentage of the interactions for an NLP item 402 across contextattributes and profiles, or within context attributes and profiles.

FIG. 5 illustrates an embodiment of an instance of an NLP itemtransmission 5001 sent to a user computing device 106 ₁, 106 _(i) . . .106 _(n), including indication or a copy of a selected document 502 forwhich the transmission applies and for each of the NLP items within theselected document 502, a NLP item/content pair 504 ₁, 504 ₂ . . . 504_(n) and an order value 506 ₁, 506 ₂ . . . 506 _(n) indicating an orderin which the NLP item will be presented to the user in the userinterface 128. The NLP item 504 _(i) information may further indicate alocation in the selected document 502 of the NLP item 504 ₁.

FIG. 6 illustrates an embodiment of operations performed by theinteraction detection unit 130 in a user computing device 106 _(i) toprovide the information management server 100 with information on a userinteraction at the user computing device 106 _(i) with an NLP element ina document 104 rendered in the user interface 128. Upon the interactiondetection unit 130 detecting (at block 600) an interaction with an NLPitem rendered in the user interface 128 through an I/O device 126, theinteraction detection unit 130 determines (at block 602) contextattribute values for context attributes related to the interaction,including user attributes of the user interacting with the NLP item(e.g., location, time, cohorts or groups in which the user is included),a question subject attributes having information on a subject of aninterrogative sentence including the NLP item (e.g., age, profession,etc.), and NLP specific attribute values, such as an interrogativesentence including the NLP item. For instance, the location may bedetermined from a location indicated in the user computing device 106_(i), such as from stored information or information from a GlobalPositioning System (GPS) device, and the time may be determined from thesystem time at the device 106 _(i). Context attribute values based onthe content of the document 104 being rendered, such as an interrogativesentence, may be determined by using NLP algorithms to analyze thesentence structure including the NLP item subject to the interaction.The interaction frequency with the NLP item is determined (at block604), which may be one or more times if there are multiple distinctinteractions as determined by the interaction detection unit 130.

A user interaction may comprise the user entering information for an NLPitem, such as an answer to an interrogative question, considering theNLP item, as evidenced by detection of mouse/keyboard interaction orgazing at a sentence including the NLP item.

The interaction detection unit 130 generates (at block 606) aninteraction information package 200 _(i) including a user ID 202 of theuser of the user computing device 106 _(i) computing unit, the NLP item204 subject to the interaction and the determined context attributevalues 206 and interaction frequency 208. The interaction informationpackage 200 _(i) is then transmitted (at block 608) to the informationmanager server 100. An interaction information package 200 _(i) mayinclude information for just interaction with one or multiple NLP itemsin the document 104.

With the embodiment of FIG. 6 , the user computing device 106 _(i)gathers directly information on how the user interacts with the NLPitems, which may comprise answers to an interrogative sentence. Thisinformation may then be combined with such interaction information frommultiple users to determine an importance of an NLP item as evidenced bycumulative user interaction with that item. The information managerserver 100 may then use this interaction information to determinepriorities for NLP items to determine an order in which to present NLPitems to the users to review at a later time, so that users are providedfirst NLP items having a highest interaction rate or considered most byusers to optimize the user response rate to review NLP items. Thisprovides users with NLP items to review based on their own previousselection of NLP items they prioritized when they were reviewing otherdocuments. Presenting to a user NLP items to consider in an order basedon the rate of interaction with NLP items by the user and their cohortsincreases the likelihood that the user will review the presented NLPitems, because they are presented in an order of importance determinedby their own previous considerations and interactions.

FIG. 7 illustrates an embodiment of operations performed by theinteraction analyzer 118 to process a received interaction informationpackage 200 _(i). Upon receiving (at block 700) an interactioninformation package 200 _(i) from an interacting user at a computingdevice 106 ₁, the interaction analyzer 118 generates (at block 702) auser interaction information 300 _(i) instance having the user ID 302(optional) of the interacting user at the user computing device 106 _(i)that sent the package 200 _(i), an information instance ID 304, aprofile attribute value of the user sending the package 200 _(i), whichmay be determined from the user profile information 120 or sent in thepackage 200 _(i), and the interaction frequency 312 as indicated infield 208 of the package 200 _(i). Each context attribute value 206 inthe interaction information package 200 _(i) is indicated (at block 704)in a context attribute value 310 filed in the user interactioninformation instance 300 _(i). The generated user interactioninformation 300 _(i) may then be stored (at block 706) in the userinteraction database 102, such as a database record or object.

With the embodiment of FIG. 7 , the information manager server 100maintains information on interactions with each NLP item in differentdatabase records across all users in the system to allow for databaseoperations to search and combine information based on NLP items, userprofiles, and context attribute values.

FIG. 8 illustrates an embodiment of operations performed by theinteraction analyzer 118 to determine an order in which to present NLPitems in a selected document 104 to be viewed in the user interface 128of a user computing device 106 ₁ of a reviewing user. This operation maybe initiated when a reviewing user selects a document 104 to review.Upon processing (at block 800) a selected document having NLP items, theinteraction analyzer 118 calls (at block 802) the NLP 114 to determineNLP items in the selected document 104, such as any NLP item or NLPitems having content to review or with errors to correct. A profilevalue of the reviewing user to which the document 104 will be sent isdetermined (at block 804), which may be determined from the user profileinformation 120, such as a role of the reviewing user in theorganization. A subject of the selected document 104 is determined (atblock 806), this may be a person or entity associated with the document104, such as a patient associated with a medical record of their medicalinformation. The subject may also be determined by processing thedocument to determine if a person is identified as the subject of thedocument, such as the subject of an interrogative question requestingthe identity of the person for which the document 104 is provided.

The interaction analyzer 118 determines (at block 808) current contextattribute values for context attributes, including user contextattributes, such as a current time, the current location of the usercomputing device 106 _(i), cohort values of groups of users in which theuser is included, such as an experience level, specific job title, etc.,and subject attribute values for the subject of the document, such aspersonal information on the person that is the subject matter of thedocument 104, e.g., age, personal or sensitive information of relevance,etc.

The interaction analyzer 118 then performs a loop of operations at block810 through 820 for each NLP item in the selected document 104. At block812, the interaction analyzer 118 determines NLP item specificattributes in the selected document 104, such as an interrogativesentence or other information specific to the NLP item being considered.The interaction analyzer 118 may then initiate a query of the userinteraction database 102 to determine (at block 814) user interactioninformation instances 300 _(i) having the profile attribute value 308and current context attribute values 310 for the NLP item 306 beingconsidered, e.g., user attribute values, subject attribute value, andNLP specific attribute values, etc., to access the user interactioninformation instances 300 _(i) relevant to the current user access ofthe document 104. The interaction analyzer 118 determines (at block 816)a cumulative interaction frequency 408 for the NLP item based on theinteraction frequency 312 for each of the determined relevantinteraction information instances 300 _(i). The cumulative interactionfrequency 408 may comprise the sum of interaction frequencies 312 forall the determined interaction information instances, or comprise somederived value, such as the some of the interaction frequencies 312weighted or as a percentage of interactive frequencies across profile orcontext attributes for the NLP item.

The interaction analyzer 118 may then assign (at block 818) a priorityvalue 410 for the NLP item based on the cumulative interaction frequency408, and generate NLP item priority information 400 _(i), having the NLPitem 402 and fields/parameters used to search, including profileattribute value 404 and context attribute values 406, the determinedcumulative interaction frequency 408 and priority value 410. This NLPitem priority information 400 _(i) may be stored in the user interactiondatabase 102 or maintained temporarily and continually recalculated whenneeded for a document 104 to provide to a reviewing user.

After determining the priority values 410 for all the NLP items in thedocument 104, the interaction analyzer 118 determines (at block 822) anorder in which to present NLP items based on the priority values 410assigned to the determined NLP items. For instance, NLP items withhigher priorities would be presented to the reviewing user before NLPitems with a lower priority or lower level of interaction. An NLP itemtransmission 500 _(i) is generated (at block 824) for the selecteddocument 502 having NLP items and content 504 ₁, 504 ₂ . . . 504 _(n),along with the determined order values 506 ₁, 506 ₂ . . . 506 _(n), tocontrol the user interface 128 to present NLP items in the determinedorder. The generated NLP item transmission 500 _(i) is then transmitted(at block 826) to the user computing device 106 ₁. The user interface128 would use the order values 506 ₁, 506 ₂ . . . 506 _(n), to determinethe order in which to present the NLP items and content 504 ₁, 504 ₂ . .. 504 _(n), in the selected document 502 to the user to review. In oneembodiment, the NLP item transmission 500 _(i) may not include NLP itemsof lower priority so as not to burden the reviewing user with too manyitems to consider. In this way, the NLP item transmission 500 _(i) mayonly include a subset of the NLP items in the document 502 having a highpriority value 410. Alternatively, the user may be presented with thelower priority NLP items later at a time they are less likely tocontinue with their review.

The described embodiments of FIG. 8 provide a database driven computersolution to maintaining information on user interaction with NLP itemsin documents to use to determine an order in which to present to the NLPitems in a selected document to review. Described embodiments determinepriorities of NLP items based on interactions with those same NLP itemsacross users. Described embodiments may further only consider thoseinteractions having context attributes that are relevant to the currentcontext attributes for the presentation of the document. In this way,interaction frequency of NLP items being considered to determine the NLPitem priority is specific to the current attributes that are presentduring the current document viewing, such as user specific contextattributes, location, time, cohorts, and attributes specific to thesubject of the document 104, such as patient or person to which thedocument pertains, as well as NLP specific items, such as aninterrogative sentence in which the NLP item is considered. In this waythe current calculated priority for the NLP items are specific to theuse in which the document will be presented and will accurately reflectthe priority that the user will expect.

FIG. 9 illustrates an embodiment of operations performed by the userinterface 128 of the user computing device 106 _(i) to render NLP itemsin a document 502 provided with the NLP item transmission 500 _(i). Uponreceiving (at block 900) from the information manager server 100 an NLPitem transmission 500 _(i) having a document 502 and NLP items 504 ₁ . .. 504 _(n) and an order 506 _(i) . . . 506 _(n) of the NLP items in thedocument 502, the user interface 128 sets (at block 902) a variable i toone. The ith ordered NLP item 504 _(i) having the order 506 ₁ isaccessed in the NLP transmission 500 _(i). Indication is made (at block906) in the user interface 128 of the ith ordered NLP item for the userto consider, such as by moving a cursor or other data entry graphicalelement to the ith order NLP item 504 ₁ in the user interface 128 toenable the user to enter content for the NLP item 504 ₁. Any usermodification to the content for the NLP item 504 ₁ indicated in the userinterface 128 is saved (at block 908).

Upon receiving (at block 910) user selection to move to a next NLP itemin the document 502, the variable i is incremented (at block 912) and if(at block 914) there is a next (i+1)th NLP item 504 _(i+1) in the order506 _(i+1), then control proceeds to block 906 to indicate that next NLPitem. If all NLP items in the order of the NLP transmission 500 _(i)have been considered, which may comprise just a subset of the NLP itemsin the document 502, then the user computing device 106 ₁ may send (atblock 916) the modified content for the NLP items for the document 502to the information management server 100 to store for the document502/104.

With the embodiment of operations for FIG. 9 , the user interface 128may guide the user to the NLP items in the document according to theorder based on a priority assigned to the NLP items, which is calculatedbased on the frequency of access of the NLP items by users in a contextand having similar roles to the context/user role at the user computingdevice 100 _(i). In this way, the user interface 128 is able to directthe user to those NLP items to correct having most priority or relevanceto similarly situated users in the system to optimize the user responseto correcting the NLP items.

FIG. 10 illustrates an embodiment of operations performed by thedocument manager 116 to process changes to content for NLP itemsreceived from a user computing device 106 _(i) in response to the userreviewing NLP items presented in an order according to the interactionpriority. Upon receiving (at block 1000) the user modifications tocontent for NLP items in the selected document 104 presented to theuser, the document manager 116 modifies (at block 1002) the content forthe NLP items in the document 104 with the received modifications to thecontent for the NLP items. The modified document 104 is then saved (atblock 1004), such as in the user interaction database 102.

With the described embodiments, NLP items with a lower priority may notbe presented to the reviewing user to review. However, the user may alsobe able to access the full set of NLP items that are not prioritized ashigh. The observation and tracking of NLP item interaction can beperformed at various user levels. At a single user level, theinteractions of a single user may be observed. For instance, a doctormay frequently check and correct an NLP item with a certain attribute,but also have to access additional NLP items at the same time. All theseinteractions would be recorded. Further, interactions with NLP items maybe considered at a group level, such interactions of a group of userssharing a group profile attribute. For instance, in a medicalenvironment, the pulmonologists may focus on interacting withrespiratory related medical information, whereas an oncologist may focuson cancer related NLP items. Other examples of groupings of users couldbe pathologists that verify and correct certain pathology items, andsurgeons that verify and correct other surgery-related items. User rolescan be determined using a staff directory such as in the user profileinformation 120.

NLP items can also be considered that have certain additional attributecontexts, such that NLP items may only be considered that have alocation attribute of the location of the reviewing user may beconsidered. For instance, when a doctor is in a clinical workroommeeting with patients, the doctor may only interact with a few NLP itemsin the patient record. However, the doctor in their office or at homemay interact with NLP items in greater detail because in such settingsthey have more time to carefully consider patient information.Furthermore, the doctor may work at multiple clinic locations, one ofwhich is the primary hospital treating patients with critical needs, andan alternate regional location that is used for regular follow-up withpatients that are not in an urgent care situation, and the doctorsconsistent differences in interactions with NLP items at the differentlocations would be observed and recorded in user interaction informationinstances. This allows customization of the priority of NLP items basedon their location.

NLP item interaction frequency may also be distinguished based on thetime of day at which the user is interacting with the system. For adoctor, the beginning of the day at the clinic, such as cancer center,can be hectic, and the doctor may have very limited time to review NLPitems in the medical report as they have to meet with many patients. Atother times of the day, such as in the afternoon, the doctors may havemore time to work with a single patient, and may review more details andNLP items in the medical record. The described embodiments record thepatterns of what attributes affect the interaction frequency ofdifferent NLP items for different times of a day.

An age of patient context attribute could be considered when determiningwhat NLP data is reviewed and corrected by the doctor. The system mayrecord that when pediatric patients are involved, the doctor prefers toreview and correct certain NLP items, versus for elderly patients.Described embodiments can observe the interactions and classify NLP itemreview and corrections needs based on observing what the doctor reviewsand corrects for different ages of patients.

A cohort of user attributes may provide a more fined grainedcategorization of a group in which the reviewing user is considered. Forinstance, in addition to recognizing that a doctor is a Leukemia doctor,there are more fine grained categorizations of cohorts of users, such as“leukemia doctors with 10 or more years of experience”, “leukemiadoctors who specialize in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) leukemiapatients”, “general oncologist who sees leukemia, lung, melanoma, andmany other cancer types”, other classifications of users may also beprovided that are observed to have a correlation with interactions withNLP items. The system could observe the NLP corrections for each user,and over time may be able to see patterns that for a certain cohort ofusers (e.g. AML leukemia specialists), certain NLP correction and reviewis common.

Upon making these observations over time, the NLP items that arefrequently corrected by a user, or by a particular user-role (such asLeukemia doctors), can be prioritized higher as items that should bepresented to the user in that cohort of users. Likewise, items that areinfrequently reviewed or corrected may be prioritized lower over timebecause they are generally considered less by this user or user-role.The user interface 128 can monitor which NLP items are modified andbased on the frequency count, can see which types of data are updated.The high priority NLP derived attributes can be presented to the user asthe items that need immediate review. The user could also be given anoption to see additional NLP derived attributes, but the user couldfocus on those high priority items if they have limited time. If thesystem has no high priority NLP derived attributes that need correction(that is, it has confidence that it already has the data it needs), thenthe user would not be prompted for any NLP corrections.

The reference characters used herein, such as i and n are used to denotea variable number of instances of an element, which may represent thesame or different values, and may represent the same or different valuewhen used with different or the same elements in different describedinstances.

The present invention may be a system, a method, and/or a computerprogram product. The computer program product may include a computerreadable storage medium (or media) having computer readable programinstructions thereon for causing a processor to carry out aspects of thepresent invention.

The computer readable storage medium can be a tangible device that canretain and store instructions for use by an instruction executiondevice. The computer readable storage medium may be, for example, but isnot limited to, an electronic storage device, a magnetic storage device,an optical storage device, an electromagnetic storage device, asemiconductor storage device, or any suitable combination of theforegoing. A non-exhaustive list of more specific examples of thecomputer readable storage medium includes the following: a portablecomputer diskette, a hard disk, a random access memory (RAM), aread-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROMor Flash memory), a static random access memory (SRAM), a portablecompact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM), a digital versatile disk (DVD),a memory stick, a floppy disk, a mechanically encoded device such aspunch-cards or raised structures in a groove having instructionsrecorded thereon, and any suitable combination of the foregoing. Acomputer readable storage medium, as used herein, is not to be construedas being transitory signals per se, such as radio waves or other freelypropagating electromagnetic waves, electromagnetic waves propagatingthrough a waveguide or other transmission media (e.g., light pulsespassing through a fiber-optic cable), or electrical signals transmittedthrough a wire.

Computer readable program instructions described herein can bedownloaded to respective computing/processing devices from a computerreadable storage medium or to an external computer or external storagedevice via a network, for example, the Internet, a local area network, awide area network and/or a wireless network. The network may comprisecopper transmission cables, optical transmission fibers, wirelesstransmission, routers, firewalls, switches, gateway computers and/oredge servers. A network adapter card or network interface in eachcomputing/processing device receives computer readable programinstructions from the network and forwards the computer readable programinstructions for storage in a computer readable storage medium withinthe respective computing/processing device.

Computer readable program instructions for carrying out operations ofthe present invention may be assembler instructions,instruction-set-architecture (ISA) instructions, machine instructions,machine dependent instructions, microcode, firmware instructions,state-setting data, or either source code or object code written in anycombination of one or more programming languages, including an objectoriented programming language such as Java, Smalltalk, C++ or the like,and conventional procedural programming languages, such as the “C”programming language or similar programming languages. The computerreadable program instructions may execute entirely on the user'scomputer, partly on the user's computer, as a stand-alone softwarepackage, partly on the user's computer and partly on a remote computeror entirely on the remote computer or server. In the latter scenario,the remote computer may be connected to the user's computer through anytype of network, including a local area network (LAN) or a wide areanetwork (WAN), or the connection may be made to an external computer(for example, through the Internet using an Internet Service Provider).In some embodiments, electronic circuitry including, for example,programmable logic circuitry, field-programmable gate arrays (FPGA), orprogrammable logic arrays (PLA) may execute the computer readableprogram instructions by utilizing state information of the computerreadable program instructions to personalize the electronic circuitry,in order to perform aspects of the present invention.

Aspects of the present invention are described herein with reference toflowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams of methods, apparatus(systems), and computer program products according to embodiments of theinvention. It will be understood that each block of the flowchartillustrations and/or block diagrams, and combinations of blocks in theflowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, can be implemented bycomputer readable program instructions.

These computer readable program instructions may be provided to aprocessor of a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, orother programmable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, suchthat the instructions, which execute via the processor of the computeror other programmable data processing apparatus, create means forimplementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or blockdiagram block or blocks. These computer readable program instructionsmay also be stored in a computer readable storage medium that can directa computer, a programmable data processing apparatus, and/or otherdevices to function in a particular manner, such that the computerreadable storage medium having instructions stored therein comprises anarticle of manufacture including instructions which implement aspects ofthe function/act specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram blockor blocks.

The computer readable program instructions may also be loaded onto acomputer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other deviceto cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer,other programmable apparatus or other device to produce a computerimplemented process, such that the instructions which execute on thecomputer, other programmable apparatus, or other device implement thefunctions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block orblocks.

The flowchart and block diagrams in the Figures illustrate thearchitecture, functionality, and operation of possible implementationsof systems, methods, and computer program products according to variousembodiments of the present invention. In this regard, each block in theflowchart or block diagrams may represent a module, segment, or portionof instructions, which comprises one or more executable instructions forimplementing the specified logical function(s). In some alternativeimplementations, the functions noted in the block may occur out of theorder noted in the figures. For example, two blocks shown in successionmay, in fact, be executed substantially concurrently, or the blocks maysometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon thefunctionality involved. It will also be noted that each block of theblock diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, and combinations of blocksin the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, can be implementedby special purpose hardware-based systems that perform the specifiedfunctions or acts or carry out combinations of special purpose hardwareand computer instructions.

The computational components of FIG. 1 , including the user computingdevices 106 ₁, 106 _(i) . . . 106 _(n) and information manager server100, may be implemented in one or more computer systems, such as thecomputer system 1002 shown in FIG. 10 . Computer system/server 1002 maybe described in the general context of computer system executableinstructions, such as program modules, being executed by a computersystem. Generally, program modules may include routines, programs,objects, components, logic, data structures, and so on that performparticular tasks or implement particular abstract data types. Computersystem/server 1002 may be practiced in distributed cloud computingenvironments where tasks are performed by remote processing devices thatare linked through a communications network. In a distributed cloudcomputing environment, program modules may be located in both local andremote computer system storage media including memory storage devices.

As shown in FIG. 11 , the computer system/server 1102 is shown in theform of a general-purpose computing device. The components of computersystem/server 1102 may include, but are not limited to, one or moreprocessors or processing units 1104, a system memory 1106, and a bus1108 that couples various system components including system memory 1106to processor 1104. Bus 1108 represents one or more of any of severaltypes of bus structures, including a memory bus or memory controller, aperipheral bus, an accelerated graphics port, and a processor or localbus using any of a variety of bus architectures. By way of example, andnot limitation, such architectures include Industry StandardArchitecture (ISA) bus, Micro Channel Architecture (MCA) bus, EnhancedISA (EISA) bus, Video Electronics Standards Association (VESA) localbus, and Peripheral Component Interconnects (PCI) bus.

Computer system/server 1102 typically includes a variety of computersystem readable media. Such media may be any available media that isaccessible by computer system/server 1102, and it includes both volatileand non-volatile media, removable and non-removable media.

System memory 1106 can include computer system readable media in theform of volatile memory, such as random access memory (RAM) 1110 and/orcache memory 1112. Computer system/server 1102 may further include otherremovable/non-removable, volatile/non-volatile computer system storagemedia. By way of example only, storage system 1113 can be provided forreading from and writing to a non-removable, non-volatile magnetic media(not shown and typically called a “hard drive”). Although not shown, amagnetic disk drive for reading from and writing to a removable,non-volatile magnetic disk (e.g., a “floppy disk”), and an optical diskdrive for reading from or writing to a removable, non-volatile opticaldisk such as a CD-ROM, DVD-ROM or other optical media can be provided.In such instances, each can be connected to bus 1108 by one or more datamedia interfaces. As will be further depicted and described below,memory 1106 may include at least one program product having a set (e.g.,at least one) of program modules that are configured to carry out thefunctions of embodiments of the invention.

Program/utility 1114, having a set (at least one) of program modules1116, may be stored in memory 1106 by way of example, and notlimitation, as well as an operating system, one or more applicationprograms, other program modules, and program data. Each of the operatingsystem, one or more application programs, other program modules, andprogram data or some combination thereof, may include an implementationof a networking environment. The components of the computer 1102 may beimplemented as program modules 1116 which generally carry out thefunctions and/or methodologies of embodiments of the invention asdescribed herein. The systems of FIG. 1 may be implemented in one ormore computer systems 1102, where if they are implemented in multiplecomputer systems 1102, then the computer systems may communicate over anetwork.

Computer system/server 1102 may also communicate with one or moreexternal devices 1118 such as a keyboard, a pointing device, a display1120, etc.; one or more devices that enable a user to interact withcomputer system/server 1102; and/or any devices (e.g., network card,modem, etc.) that enable computer system/server 1102 to communicate withone or more other computing devices. Such communication can occur viaInput/Output (I/O) interfaces 1122. Still yet, computer system/server1102 can communicate with one or more networks such as a local areanetwork (LAN), a general wide area network (WAN), and/or a publicnetwork (e.g., the Internet) via network adapter 1124. As depicted,network adapter 1124 communicates with the other components of computersystem/server 1102 via bus 1108. It should be understood that althoughnot shown, other hardware and/or software components could be used inconjunction with computer system/server 1102. Examples, include, but arenot limited to: microcode, device drivers, redundant processing units,external disk drive arrays, RAID systems, tape drives, and data archivalstorage systems, etc.

The terms “an embodiment”, “embodiment”, “embodiments”, “theembodiment”, “the embodiments”, “one or more embodiments”, “someembodiments”, and “one embodiment” mean “one or more (but not all)embodiments of the present invention(s)” unless expressly specifiedotherwise.

The terms “including”, “comprising”, “having” and variations thereofmean “including but not limited to”, unless expressly specifiedotherwise.

The enumerated listing of items does not imply that any or all of theitems are mutually exclusive, unless expressly specified otherwise.

The terms “a”, “an” and “the” mean “one or more”, unless expresslyspecified otherwise.

Devices that are in communication with each other need not be incontinuous communication with each other, unless expressly specifiedotherwise. In addition, devices that are in communication with eachother may communicate directly or indirectly through one or moreintermediaries.

A description of an embodiment with several components in communicationwith each other does not imply that all such components are required. Onthe contrary a variety of optional components are described toillustrate the wide variety of possible embodiments of the presentinvention.

When a single device or article is described herein, it will be readilyapparent that more than one device/article (whether or not theycooperate) may be used in place of a single device/article. Similarly,where more than one device or article is described herein (whether ornot they cooperate), it will be readily apparent that a singledevice/article may be used in place of the more than one device orarticle or a different number of devices/articles may be used instead ofthe shown number of devices or programs. The functionality and/or thefeatures of a device may be alternatively embodied by one or more otherdevices which are not explicitly described as having suchfunctionality/features. Thus, other embodiments of the present inventionneed not include the device itself.

The foregoing description of various embodiments of the invention hasbeen presented for the purposes of illustration and description. It isnot intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the preciseform disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in lightof the above teaching. It is intended that the scope of the invention belimited not by this detailed description, but rather by the claimsappended hereto. The above specification, examples and data provide acomplete description of the manufacture and use of the composition ofthe invention. Since many embodiments of the invention can be madewithout departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, theinvention resides in the claims herein after appended.

What is claimed is:
 1. A computer program product for prioritizinginformation to present to at least one user operating at least onecomputing device, wherein the computer program product comprises acomputer readable storage medium having program instructions embodiedtherewith, that when executed cause operations, the operationscomprising: providing user interaction information with natural languageprocessing (NLP) items presented in documents for users to correct,wherein the NLP items are identified in the documents using a naturallanguage processor, and wherein the user interaction information for theNLP items indicates user interaction frequencies with the NLP items forusers that have interacted with the NLP items presented in the documentsand context attribute values related to user interactions with the NLPitems; determining, using the natural language processor, NLP items in aselected document to present to a reviewing user, wherein the NLP itemsin the selected document have content to review to correct for errors;determining a context attribute value for the selected document;determining user interaction information for the NLP items in theselected document from users other than the reviewing user having thedetermined context attribute value; calculating cumulative interactionfrequencies for the NLP items in the selected document from userinteraction frequencies in the determined user interaction informationfor the users that have interacted with the NLP items; determining anorder to present the NLP items in the selected document to present tothe reviewing user to correct based on the cumulative interactionfrequencies determined for the NLP items in the selected document; andtransmitting, to a computing device of the reviewing user, the selecteddocument with the determined NLP items presented in the determined orderfor the reviewing user to review and correct.
 2. The computer programproduct of claim 1, wherein the operations further comprise: receiving,from the computing device of the reviewing user, modifications tocontent for the determined NLP items in the selected documenttransmitted to the reviewing user; modifying the content for thedetermined NLP items in the selected document with the modifications tothe content; and saving the selected document having the modifiedcontent.
 3. The computer program product of claim 1, wherein theoperations further comprise: processing the selected document todetermine errors in content provided for the determined NLP items in theselected document, wherein the transmitted selected document is for thedetermined NLP items determined to have errors.
 4. The computer programproduct of claim 1, wherein the user interactions with the determinedNLP items comprises at least one of entering text for the determined NLPitems, viewing the determined NLP items, and selecting the determinedNLP items without entering text for the determined NLP items.
 5. Thecomputer program product of claim 1, wherein the determining the orderof the determined NLP items in the selected document based on thecumulative interaction frequencies comprises: assigning a priority toeach of the determined NLP items based on the cumulative interactionfrequencies for the determined NLP items; and determining the order inwhich to present the determined NLP items in the selected documentaccording to priorities assigned to the determined NLP items to presentthe determined NLP items having a higher priority before the determinedNLP items having a lower priority.
 6. The computer program product ofclaim 1, wherein the operations further comprise: determining a profileattribute value of the reviewing user from a plurality of profileattribute values, wherein the user interaction information is furtherdetermined from user interaction information generated from interactionsby users having the determined profile attribute value; and assigningpriority values to the determined NLP items based on the cumulativeinteraction frequencies with the determined NLP items by the usershaving the profile attribute value and the determined context attributevalue, wherein the order of presenting the determined NLP items isdetermined according to the priority values assigned to the determinedNLP items.
 7. The computer program product of claim 1, wherein the userinteraction information on the user interactions with the determined NLPitems having the context attribute value are gathered from a pluralityof users at a plurality of computing devices interacting with NLP itemsfrom multiple documents, and wherein the user interaction informationused to determine priorities for the NLP items are gathered from theplurality of users.
 8. The computer program product of claim 7, whereinthe plurality of users are associated with a profile value of aplurality of profile values, wherein the user interaction informationindicates the profile value of one of the plurality of users thatinteracted with an NLP item for which the user interaction informationwas generated, wherein the determining the user interaction informationcomprises determining interaction information having a profile value ofthe profile value of the reviewing user to receive the determined NLPitems from the selected document.
 9. The computer program product ofclaim 1, wherein the context attribute value comprises at least one of:user values related to user attributes of a user when interacting withthe NLP item; a question subject attribute value indicating a subject ofan interrogative sentence including the NLP item interacted with by theuser; and an NLP item specific attribute value specific to a context ofthe determined NLP item in the selected document.
 10. The computerprogram product of claim 9, wherein the user attributes include at leastone of a location attribute comprising one of a plurality of locationattribute values for different location descriptions of where the userwas located when interacting with the NLP item, a time attributecomprising one of a plurality of time period values of when the user wasinteracting with the NLP item, and a user cohort value comprising one ofa plurality of user cohort values of groups of users; wherein thequestion subject attribute value indicates at least one of an ageattribute having one of a plurality of age values of the subject, and atleast one additional subject attribute relevant to the interrogativesentence including the NLP item; and wherein the NLP item specificattribute comprises an interrogative attribute having an interrogativeattribute value comprising the interrogative sentence including the NLPitem interacted with by the user.
 11. The computer program product ofclaim 10, wherein the users comprise medical professionals, the subjectof interrogative sentences including the NLP items comprises a patient,the NLP items are related to medical treatment of patients, thedocuments comprise patient medical records, wherein the locationattribute values include a type of medical facility where the user islocated, wherein the at least one additional subject attribute comprisesat least one medical condition of the subject, and wherein theinterrogative sentences including the NLP items concern gatheringmedical information related to the patients that are subjects of theinterrogative sentences.
 12. A system for prioritizing information topresent to at least one user operating at least one computing device,comprising: a processor; and a computer readable storage medium havingprogram instructions embodied therewith, that when executed by theprocessor cause operations, the operations comprising: providing userinteraction information with natural language processing (NLP) itemspresented in documents for users to correct, wherein the NLP items areidentified in the documents using a natural language processor, andwherein the user interaction information for the NLP items indicatesuser interaction frequencies with the NLP items for users that haveinteracted with the NLP items presented in the documents and contextattribute values related to user interactions with the NLP items;determining, using the natural language processor, NLP items in aselected document to present to a reviewing user, wherein the NLP itemsin the selected document have content to review to correct for errors;determining a context attribute value for the selected document;determining user interaction information for the NLP items in theselected document from users other than the reviewing user having thedetermined context attribute value; calculating cumulative interactionfrequencies for the NLP items in the selected document from userinteraction frequencies in the determined user interaction informationfor the users that have interacted with the NLP items; determining anorder to present the NLP items in the selected document to present tothe reviewing user to correct based on the cumulative interactionfrequencies determined for the NLP items in the selected document; andtransmitting, to a computing device of the reviewing user, the selecteddocument with the determined NLP items presented in the determined orderfor the reviewing user to review and correct.
 13. The system of claim12, wherein the determining the order of the determined NLP items in theselected document based on the cumulative interaction frequenciescomprises: assigning a priority to each of the determined NLP itemsbased on the cumulative interaction frequencies for the determined NLPitems; and determining the order in which to present the determined NLPitems in the selected document according to priorities assigned to thedetermined NLP items to present the determined NLP items having a higherpriority before the determined NLP items having a lower priority. 14.The system of claim 12, wherein the operations further comprise:determining a profile attribute value of the reviewing user from aplurality of profile attribute values, wherein the user interactioninformation is further determined from user interaction informationgenerated from interactions by users having the determined profileattribute value; and assigning priority values to the determined NLPitems based on the cumulative interaction frequencies with thedetermined NLP items by the users having the profile attribute value andthe determined context attribute value, wherein the order of presentingthe determined NLP items is determined according to the priority valuesassigned to the determined NLP items.
 15. The system of claim 12,wherein the context attribute value comprises at least one of: uservalues related to user attributes of a user when interacting with theNLP item; a question subject attribute value indicating a subject of aninterrogative sentence including the NLP item interacted with by theuser; and an NLP item specific attribute value specific to a context ofthe determined NLP item in the selected document.
 16. The system ofclaim 12, wherein the operations further comprise: receiving, from thecomputing device of the reviewing user, modifications to content for thedetermined NLP items in the selected document transmitted to thereviewing user; modifying the content for the determined NLP items inthe selected document with the modifications to the content; and savingthe selected document having the modified content.
 17. The system ofclaim 12, wherein the operations further comprise: processing theselected document to determine errors in content provided for thedetermined NLP items in the selected document, wherein the transmittedselected document is for the determined NLP items determined to haveerrors.
 18. The system of claim 12, wherein the user interactions withthe determined NLP items comprises at least one of entering text for thedetermined NLP items, viewing the determined NLP items, and selectingthe determined NLP items without entering text for the determined NLPitems.
 19. The system of claim 12, wherein the user interactioninformation on the user interactions with the NLP items having thecontext attribute value are gathered from a plurality of users at aplurality of computing devices interacting with NLP items from multipledocuments, and wherein the user interaction information used todetermine priorities for the NLP items are gathered from the pluralityof users.
 20. The system of claim 19, wherein the plurality of users areassociated with a profile value of a plurality of profile values,wherein the user interaction information indicates the profile value ofone of the plurality of users that interacted with an NLP item for whichthe user interaction information was generated, wherein the determiningthe user interaction information comprises determining interactioninformation having a profile value of the profile value of the reviewinguser to receive the determined NLP items from the selected document.